Time required to register property (days) - Country Ranking - Africa

Definition: Time required to register property is the number of calendar days needed for businesses to secure rights to property.

Source: World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Angola 190.00 2019
2 Somalia 188.00 2019
3 Benin 120.00 2019
4 Madagascar 100.00 2019
5 Nigeria 91.66 2019
6 Cameroon 81.00 2019
7 Eritrea 78.00 2019
8 Egypt 76.00 2019
9 Central African Republic 75.00 2019
10 The Gambia 73.00 2019
11 Gabon 72.00 2019
12 Burkina Faso 67.00 2019
12 Tanzania 67.00 2019
14 Sierra Leone 56.00 2019
15 Algeria 55.00 2019
16 Congo 54.00 2019
17 Ethiopia 52.00 2019
17 São Tomé and Principe 52.00 2019
19 Mauritania 49.00 2019
20 Guinea-Bissau 48.00 2019
21 Malawi 47.00 2019
22 Zambia 45.00 2019
23 Namibia 44.00 2019
23 Guinea 44.00 2019
23 Liberia 44.00 2019
26 Kenya 43.50 2019
27 Mozambique 43.00 2019
27 Lesotho 43.00 2019
29 Uganda 42.00 2019
30 Senegal 41.00 2019
31 Côte d'Ivoire 39.00 2019
32 Dem. Rep. Congo 38.00 2019
33 Togo 35.00 2019
33 Tunisia 35.00 2019
35 Seychelles 33.00 2019
35 Ghana 33.00 2019
37 Comoros 30.00 2019
38 Mali 29.00 2019
38 Chad 29.00 2019
38 Zimbabwe 29.00 2019
41 Botswana 27.00 2019
42 Djibouti 24.00 2019
43 Burundi 23.00 2019
43 Equatorial Guinea 23.00 2019
43 South Africa 23.00 2019
46 Eswatini 21.00 2019
47 Morocco 20.00 2019
48 Cabo Verde 19.00 2019
49 Mauritius 17.00 2019
50 Niger 13.00 2019
51 Sudan 11.00 2019
52 Rwanda 7.00 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: The economic health of a country is measured not only in macroeconomic terms but also by other factors that shape daily economic activity such as laws, regulations, and institutional arrangements. The data measure business regulation, gauge regulatory outcomes, and measure the extent of legal protection of property, the flexibility of employment regulation, and the tax burden on businesses. The fundamental premise of this data is that economic activity requires good rules and regulations that are efficient, accessible to all who need to use them, and simple to implement. Thus sometimes there is more emphasis on more regulation, such as stricter disclosure requirements in related-party transactions, and other times emphasis is on for simplified regulations, such as a one-stop shop for completing business startup formalities. Entrepreneurs may not be aware of all required procedures or may avoid legally required procedures altogether. But where regulation is particularly onerous, levels of informality are higher, which comes at a cost: firms in the informal sector usually grow more slowly, have less access to credit, and employ fewer workers - and those workers remain outside the protections of labor law. The indicator can help policymakers understand the business environment in a country and - along with information from other sources such as the World Bank's Enterprise Surveys - provide insights into potential areas of reform.

Limitations and Exceptions: The Doing Business methodology has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the data. First, the data collected refer to businesses in the economy's largest city and may not represent regulations in other locations of the economy. To address this limitation, subnational indicators are being collected for selected economies. These subnational studies point to significant differences in the speed of reform and the ease of doing business across cities in the same economy. Second, the data often focus on a specific business form - generally a limited liability company of a specified size - and may not represent regulation for other types of businesses such as sole proprietorships. Third, transactions described in a standardized business case refer to a specific set of issues and may not represent the full set of issues a business encounters. Fourth, the time measures involve an element of judgment by the expert respondents. When sources indicate different estimates, the Doing Business time indicators represent the median values of several responses given under the assumptions of the standardized case. Fifth, the methodology assumes that a business has full information on what is required and does not waste time when completing procedures.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Data are collected by the World Bank with a standardized survey that uses a simple business case to ensure comparability across economies and over time - with assumptions about the legal form of the business, its size, its location, and nature of its operation. Surveys are administered through more than 9,000 local experts, including lawyers, business consultants, accountants, freight forwarders, government officials, and other professionals who routinely administer or advise on legal and regulatory requirements. The indicator records the procedures necessary for a business to purchase a property from another business and to formally transfer the property title to the buyer's name. The process starts with obtaining the necessary documents, such as a copy of the seller's title, and ends when the buyer is registered as the new owner of the property. Every procedure required by law or necessary in practice is included, whether it is the responsibility of the seller or the buyer and even if it must be completed by a third party on their behalf. The Doing Business project of the World Bank encompasses two types of data: data from readings of laws and regulations and data on time and motion indicators that measure efficiency in achieving a regulatory goal. Within the time and motion indicators cost estimates are recorded from official fee schedules where applicable. The data from surveys are subjected to numerous tests for robustness, which lead to revision or expansion of the information collected.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual

General Comments: Data are presented for the survey year instead of publication year.