Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population) - Country Ranking - Africa

Definition: Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Eswatini 80.37 2016
2 South Africa 78.65 2014
3 Lesotho 70.65 2017
4 Burkina Faso 54.94 2018
5 Botswana 52.19 2015
6 Mauritius 50.32 2017
7 Gabon 46.64 2017
8 Mauritania 45.22 2014
9 Egypt 44.88 2008
10 Malawi 41.22 2016
11 Namibia 40.64 2015
12 Morocco 36.59 2009
13 Zimbabwe 31.09 2019
14 Côte d'Ivoire 27.23 2015
15 Kenya 26.44 2015
16 Cabo Verde 21.87 2007
17 Ethiopia 20.71 2018
18 Niger 20.11 2014
19 Rwanda 20.09 2013
20 Ghana 18.14 2016
21 Nigeria 17.04 2018
22 Sierra Leone 16.24 2018
23 Angola 16.17 2018
24 Tunisia 14.43 2010
25 Liberia 12.69 2016
26 Tanzania 10.94 2014
27 Dem. Rep. Congo 9.99 2012
28 Djibouti 9.53 2012
29 Senegal 8.24 2011
30 Sudan 7.45 2009
31 Guinea 1.71 2012
32 Mozambique 1.58 2014
33 The Gambia 1.53 2015
34 Zambia 1.46 2015
35 Congo 0.92 2005
36 Cameroon 0.87 2014
37 Uganda 0.64 2016
38 Chad 0.57 2011

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual