Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population) - Country Ranking - Africa

Definition: Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Eswatini 96.75 2016
2 South Africa 96.14 2014
3 Lesotho 88.93 2017
4 Botswana 63.34 2015
5 Zimbabwe 58.96 2019
6 Burkina Faso 55.21 2018
7 Egypt 54.86 2008
8 Morocco 50.11 2009
9 Namibia 50.05 2015
10 Gabon 49.89 2017
11 Malawi 49.50 2016
12 Mauritius 49.02 2017
13 Mauritania 47.46 2014
14 Ghana 38.69 2016
15 Côte d'Ivoire 36.46 2015
16 Kenya 34.51 2015
17 Djibouti 30.83 2012
18 Ethiopia 30.01 2018
19 Nigeria 27.46 2018
20 Cabo Verde 25.35 2007
21 Sierra Leone 22.22 2018
22 Rwanda 20.05 2013
23 Tunisia 19.81 2010
24 Liberia 19.50 2016
25 Niger 15.51 2014
26 Angola 14.59 2018
27 Sudan 13.10 2009
28 Tanzania 8.67 2014
29 Senegal 5.15 2011
30 Dem. Rep. Congo 4.83 2012
31 The Gambia 2.18 2015
32 Mozambique 1.57 2014
33 Guinea 1.28 2012
34 Congo 1.02 2005
35 Zambia 0.62 2015
36 Uganda 0.46 2016
37 Chad 0.09 2011
38 Cameroon 0.00 2014

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual