Informal payments to public officials (% of firms) - Country Ranking

Definition: Informal payments to public officials are the percentage of firms expected to make informal payments to public officials to "get things done" with regard to customs, taxes, licenses, regulations, services, and the like.

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Vietnam 90.70 2015
2 Papua New Guinea 89.30 2015
3 Timor-Leste 85.60 2015
4 Syrian Arab Republic 83.80 2009
5 Zambia 83.00 2019
6 Solomon Islands 81.90 2015
7 Congo 81.80 2009
8 Algeria 66.60 2007
9 Cambodia 66.30 2016
10 Guinea-Bissau 63.10 2006
11 Philippines 59.40 2015
12 Nigeria 55.30 2014
13 Yemen 55.00 2013
14 Liberia 52.80 2017
15 Dem. Rep. Congo 50.40 2013
16 Angola 48.90 2010
17 Guinea 48.70 2016
18 Bangladesh 48.50 2013
19 Sierra Leone 46.00 2017
20 Pakistan 45.80 2013
21 Cameroon 45.60 2016
22 Mali 43.90 2016
23 Madagascar 43.10 2013
24 Central African Republic 41.80 2011
24 Gabon 41.80 2009
26 Afghanistan 39.30 2014
27 Morocco 38.40 2019
28 Chad 38.00 2018
29 Malaysia 37.50 2015
30 Lao PDR 36.70 2018
31 Benin 33.40 2016
32 Iraq 31.80 2011
33 Albania 31.60 2019
34 Burundi 31.20 2014
35 Panama 30.50 2010
36 Kyrgyz Republic 29.60 2019
37 Niger 29.40 2017
38 Samoa 29.30 2009
39 Côte d'Ivoire 29.20 2016
40 Mauritania 27.80 2014
40 Uganda 27.80 2013
42 Kenya 26.30 2018
43 Slovak Republic 25.30 2019
44 Suriname 24.80 2018
45 Ghana 24.30 2013
45 Ukraine 24.30 2019
47 Venezuela 23.70 2010
48 Indonesia 21.00 2015
49 Hungary 20.20 2019
50 Tanzania 20.00 2013
51 Czech Republic 19.90 2019
52 Bolivia 19.20 2017
53 The Bahamas 19.10 2010
54 Guyana 18.40 2010
55 Jamaica 17.90 2010
56 Thailand 17.60 2016
57 Montenegro 17.10 2019
58 Eswatini 17.00 2016
59 Russia 16.60 2019
59 Malawi 16.60 2014
59 India 16.60 2014
62 Myanmar 16.50 2016
63 Romania 15.60 2019
64 Dominican Republic 15.30 2016
65 Barbados 14.70 2010
66 Zimbabwe 14.40 2016
67 Nepal 14.30 2013
68 Mozambique 14.10 2018
69 Korea 14.00 2005
70 Lesotho 13.80 2016
71 Sri Lanka 13.70 2011
72 Peru 13.60 2017
73 Trinidad and Tobago 13.40 2010
73 Bulgaria 13.40 2019
75 The Gambia 12.80 2018
76 Tonga 12.70 2009
77 Brazil 12.50 2009
77 Moldova 12.50 2019
79 Djibouti 12.10 2013
80 Tajikistan 11.70 2019
81 Mexico 11.60 2010
82 Lebanon 11.30 2019
83 Honduras 10.90 2016
83 Cyprus 10.90 2019
85 Colombia 10.80 2017
86 China 10.70 2012
87 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10.60 2019
88 Poland 10.40 2019
89 Fiji 10.20 2009
90 Nicaragua 10.00 2016
91 Mongolia 8.60 2019
92 Guatemala 8.50 2017
92 Burkina Faso 8.50 2009
94 Italy 8.40 2019
95 Ethiopia 8.30 2015
96 Paraguay 8.20 2017
97 Kazakhstan 7.90 2019
98 Serbia 7.80 2019
99 Botswana 7.30 2010
99 Uzbekistan 7.30 2019
101 Grenada 7.10 2010
102 Argentina 6.80 2017
103 Senegal 6.30 2014
103 Lithuania 6.30 2019
105 Togo 6.20 2016
106 St. Kitts and Nevis 6.10 2010
107 Cabo Verde 6.00 2009
108 Mauritius 5.90 2009
109 Azerbaijan 5.80 2019
109 Sudan 5.80 2014
111 El Salvador 5.50 2016
112 Greece 5.20 2018
113 Belarus 5.10 2018
114 Egypt 5.00 2020
115 Antigua and Barbuda 4.80 2010
116 Namibia 4.60 2014
117 Slovenia 4.40 2019
117 Ecuador 4.40 2017
117 Spain 4.40 2005
117 Latvia 4.40 2019
121 North Macedonia 4.30 2019
122 Vanuatu 4.20 2009
123 Croatia 3.80 2019
124 Costa Rica 3.70 2010
125 Jordan 3.50 2019
126 Estonia 3.40 2019
127 Belize 3.00 2010
128 Portugal 2.80 2019
128 Tunisia 2.80 2020
128 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 2.80 2010
131 Georgia 2.70 2019
131 Netherlands 2.70 2020
133 Finland 2.30 2020
134 Uruguay 2.00 2017
135 South Africa 1.50 2020
136 Armenia 1.10 2020
137 Denmark 1.00 2020
138 Belgium 0.90 2020
139 Chile 0.70 2010
139 Turkey 0.70 2019
141 Luxembourg 0.50 2020
141 Rwanda 0.50 2019
143 St. Lucia 0.40 2010
144 Israel 0.20 2013
145 Bhutan 0.10 2015
146 Dominica 0.00 2010
146 Ireland 0.00 2020
146 Sweden 0.00 2020
146 Malta 0.00 2019
146 Eritrea 0.00 2009

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. Corruption by public officials may present a major administrative and financial burden on firms. Corruption creates an unfavorable business environment by undermining the operational efficiency of firms and raising the costs and risks associated with doing business. In some countries doing business requires informal payments to "get things done" in customs, taxes, licenses, regulations, services, and the like. Such corruption can harm the business environment by distorting policymaking, undermining government credibility, and diverting public resources.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual