Firms formally registered when operations started (% of firms) - Country Ranking

Definition: Firms formally registered when operations started are the percentage of firms formally registered when they started operations in the country.

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Eritrea 100.00 2009
1 Lithuania 100.00 2019
3 Estonia 99.90 2019
4 Slovenia 99.80 2019
5 Panama 99.70 2010
6 Latvia 99.50 2019
7 Hungary 99.40 2019
8 Georgia 99.20 2019
8 Croatia 99.20 2019
8 Uzbekistan 99.20 2019
11 Bosnia and Herzegovina 98.90 2019
11 Slovak Republic 98.90 2019
13 Bulgaria 98.80 2019
13 Serbia 98.80 2019
15 St. Lucia 98.50 2010
15 Djibouti 98.50 2013
17 Algeria 98.30 2007
18 Greece 98.10 2018
18 Belarus 98.10 2018
18 North Macedonia 98.10 2019
21 Kyrgyz Republic 98.00 2019
22 Czech Republic 97.70 2019
23 Romania 97.50 2019
24 Dominica 97.40 2010
25 Kazakhstan 97.30 2019
26 Zimbabwe 97.20 2016
27 Jordan 97.10 2019
27 Azerbaijan 97.10 2019
29 Timor-Leste 97.00 2015
29 Sudan 97.00 2014
31 Guinea 96.90 2016
32 Armenia 96.80 2020
33 Paraguay 96.30 2017
33 Montenegro 96.30 2019
35 Moldova 96.10 2019
36 Chile 96.00 2010
36 Tunisia 96.00 2020
38 Belgium 95.80 2020
38 China 95.80 2012
38 Turkey 95.80 2019
38 South Africa 95.80 2020
42 Venezuela 95.60 2010
42 Ethiopia 95.60 2015
44 Mongolia 95.50 2019
45 Bhutan 95.20 2015
45 Italy 95.20 2019
47 Papua New Guinea 95.00 2015
47 Sweden 95.00 2020
49 Brazil 94.90 2009
50 Uruguay 94.70 2017
50 Luxembourg 94.70 2020
52 Netherlands 94.60 2020
53 Mozambique 94.50 2018
54 Poland 94.30 2019
55 Botswana 93.90 2010
56 Eswatini 93.70 2016
57 Fiji 93.50 2009
57 Tonga 93.50 2009
59 Philippines 93.30 2015
60 Portugal 93.10 2019
61 Ukraine 92.80 2019
61 The Bahamas 92.80 2010
63 Finland 92.70 2020
64 Albania 92.60 2019
65 Afghanistan 92.30 2014
65 Argentina 92.30 2017
67 Central African Republic 92.10 2011
68 Vietnam 91.60 2015
69 Russia 91.40 2019
69 Cyprus 91.40 2019
71 Sierra Leone 91.30 2017
71 Lesotho 91.30 2016
73 Morocco 91.10 2019
73 Malta 91.10 2019
73 Colombia 91.10 2017
76 Antigua and Barbuda 91.00 2010
77 Israel 90.80 2013
78 Benin 90.60 2016
79 Malawi 90.30 2014
80 Nepal 90.10 2013
81 Jamaica 90.00 2010
82 Kenya 89.60 2018
83 Peru 88.90 2017
84 Solomon Islands 88.70 2015
85 Egypt 88.60 2020
85 Madagascar 88.60 2013
87 Ecuador 88.40 2017
87 Samoa 88.40 2009
89 Denmark 88.20 2020
90 Vanuatu 88.10 2009
91 Côte d'Ivoire 87.90 2016
92 Senegal 87.80 2014
93 Lebanon 87.20 2019
93 India 87.20 2014
95 Burundi 87.10 2014
96 Thailand 86.70 2016
96 Tajikistan 86.70 2019
98 Mali 86.50 2016
99 Guatemala 86.00 2017
99 Bangladesh 86.00 2013
99 Niger 86.00 2017
102 Mauritania 85.70 2014
103 Honduras 85.50 2016
104 Mexico 84.70 2010
105 Zambia 84.50 2019
106 St. Kitts and Nevis 84.40 2010
107 Congo 84.30 2009
108 Mauritius 84.20 2009
109 Namibia 83.50 2014
109 Nicaragua 83.50 2016
109 Suriname 83.50 2018
112 El Salvador 83.30 2016
113 Barbados 82.80 2010
114 Ireland 82.60 2020
115 Guyana 81.70 2010
116 Cabo Verde 81.30 2009
117 Cameroon 81.10 2016
118 Togo 81.00 2016
119 Costa Rica 80.80 2010
120 Rwanda 80.50 2019
121 Pakistan 79.80 2013
122 Bolivia 79.70 2017
123 Belize 79.20 2010
124 Myanmar 79.10 2016
125 Dominican Republic 78.70 2016
126 Burkina Faso 77.70 2009
126 Trinidad and Tobago 77.70 2010
128 Lao PDR 77.60 2018
129 Sri Lanka 77.30 2011
130 The Gambia 77.20 2018
131 Ghana 76.50 2013
132 Tanzania 75.00 2013
133 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 72.60 2010
134 Malaysia 71.30 2015
135 Liberia 71.20 2017
136 Grenada 71.10 2010
137 Cambodia 69.50 2016
138 Dem. Rep. Congo 68.90 2013
139 Yemen 68.80 2013
140 Chad 66.60 2018
141 Gabon 63.70 2009
142 Uganda 63.20 2013
143 Angola 62.70 2010
144 Iraq 62.40 2011
145 Indonesia 60.80 2015
146 Nigeria 57.70 2014

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. In this indicator informality is associated with business operations without registration. The informal sector in an economy may be a source of unfair competition to formal firms and also deprive governments of potential tax revenue and diminish a government's capacity for regulatory oversight. Informality can be defined along different dimensions such as operating without registration, income tax evasion, labor tax evasion, or operating outside the legal framework of an economy. Firms may show different degrees of informality along these dimensions which may also overlap. A large informal sector has serious consequences for the formal private sector, and may pose unfair competition for formal firms. It is an approximation to the prevalence of informality in the private economy.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual