Firms expected to give gifts in meetings with tax officials (% of firms) - Country Ranking

Definition: Firms expected to give gifts in meetings with tax officials is the percentage of firms that answered positively to the question "was a gift or informal payment expected or requested during a meeting with tax officials?"

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Yemen 62.60 2013
2 Syrian Arab Republic 61.00 2009
3 Cambodia 58.70 2016
4 Dem. Rep. Congo 53.90 2013
5 Liberia 41.70 2017
6 Bangladesh 41.00 2013
7 Congo 37.10 2009
8 Ukraine 36.30 2019
9 Lao PDR 35.20 2018
10 Albania 34.60 2019
11 Angola 34.20 2010
12 Afghanistan 34.00 2014
13 Mali 32.10 2016
14 Russia 31.70 2019
14 Madagascar 31.70 2013
16 Solomon Islands 30.90 2015
17 Sierra Leone 29.60 2017
18 Iraq 29.20 2011
19 Pakistan 28.80 2013
20 Kyrgyz Republic 28.70 2019
21 Nigeria 25.90 2014
22 Vietnam 25.00 2015
23 Malaysia 23.70 2015
24 Côte d'Ivoire 22.90 2016
25 Montenegro 22.80 2019
25 Gabon 22.80 2009
27 Guinea-Bissau 22.70 2006
28 Indonesia 21.60 2015
29 Korea 21.30 2005
30 Chad 21.00 2018
31 Kenya 20.90 2018
32 Cameroon 20.40 2016
32 Myanmar 20.40 2016
32 Mauritania 20.40 2014
35 Burundi 20.00 2014
36 Samoa 19.60 2009
37 Lebanon 19.30 2019
38 Malawi 18.30 2014
39 Ethiopia 17.40 2015
40 Timor-Leste 17.10 2015
41 Central African Republic 16.80 2011
42 Paraguay 16.10 2017
43 Mongolia 16.00 2019
44 Lesotho 15.70 2016
45 India 15.30 2014
46 Algeria 15.00 2007
47 Germany 14.80 2005
48 Tanzania 14.60 2013
49 Bosnia and Herzegovina 14.40 2019
50 Jamaica 14.30 2010
50 Spain 14.30 2005
50 Uganda 14.30 2013
53 Philippines 14.10 2015
54 Mozambique 13.50 2018
55 Croatia 12.60 2019
55 Zimbabwe 12.60 2016
57 St. Lucia 11.90 2010
57 Dominican Republic 11.90 2016
57 Kazakhstan 11.90 2019
60 Ghana 11.40 2013
61 Benin 11.00 2016
62 China 10.90 2012
62 The Bahamas 10.90 2010
64 Mexico 10.40 2010
64 Nepal 10.40 2013
66 Morocco 10.00 2019
67 Moldova 9.70 2019
67 Azerbaijan 9.70 2019
69 Bulgaria 9.40 2019
70 Colombia 9.10 2017
71 Bolivia 8.70 2017
72 Thailand 8.50 2016
73 Botswana 8.40 2010
74 Brazil 8.30 2009
75 Tajikistan 8.10 2019
76 Sri Lanka 7.70 2011
76 Suriname 7.70 2018
78 Costa Rica 7.60 2010
79 Senegal 7.30 2014
80 Peru 7.00 2017
81 Guinea 6.90 2016
82 Belize 6.70 2010
82 Uzbekistan 6.70 2019
82 Burkina Faso 6.70 2009
85 Eswatini 6.60 2016
86 Venezuela 6.40 2010
86 Panama 6.40 2010
88 Niger 6.10 2017
88 Antigua and Barbuda 6.10 2010
90 Argentina 6.00 2017
91 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 5.90 2010
92 The Gambia 5.60 2018
92 Dominica 5.60 2010
94 Trinidad and Tobago 5.50 2010
95 Namibia 5.30 2014
96 Zambia 5.00 2019
96 Romania 5.00 2019
98 Nicaragua 4.80 2016
98 Tunisia 4.80 2020
100 Togo 4.70 2016
101 Guyana 4.60 2010
101 Egypt 4.60 2020
101 Vanuatu 4.60 2009
104 Rwanda 4.50 2019
104 Fiji 4.50 2009
106 Italy 4.20 2019
107 Honduras 3.90 2016
108 North Macedonia 3.70 2019
108 Belarus 3.70 2018
110 Ecuador 3.50 2017
111 Djibouti 3.40 2013
112 Sudan 3.20 2014
113 Poland 3.00 2019
114 Hungary 2.50 2019
115 Grenada 1.90 2010
116 Greece 1.70 2018
116 South Africa 1.70 2020
118 Barbados 1.60 2010
119 Ireland 1.50 2020
120 Tonga 1.40 2009
121 Turkey 1.30 2019
122 Serbia 1.20 2019
123 Cabo Verde 1.10 2009
123 Finland 1.10 2020
125 Georgia 1.00 2019
126 Slovak Republic 0.90 2019
127 El Salvador 0.70 2016
128 Jordan 0.60 2019
129 Chile 0.40 2010
130 Bhutan 0.30 2015
130 Mauritius 0.30 2009
130 Guatemala 0.30 2017
133 Belgium 0.20 2020
134 Armenia 0.10 2020
134 Portugal 0.10 2019
136 Slovenia 0.00 2019
136 Netherlands 0.00 2020
136 Malta 0.00 2019
136 Eritrea 0.00 2009
136 Estonia 0.00 2019
136 Denmark 0.00 2020
136 Cyprus 0.00 2019
136 Czech Republic 0.00 2019
136 St. Kitts and Nevis 0.00 2010
136 Israel 0.00 2013
136 Papua New Guinea 0.00 2015
136 Sweden 0.00 2020
136 Lithuania 0.00 2019
136 Luxembourg 0.00 2020
136 Latvia 0.00 2019
136 Uruguay 0.00 2017

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. The reliability and availability of infrastructure benefit households and support development. Firms with access to modern and efficient infrastructure - telecommunications, electricity, and transport - can be more productive. A strong infrastructure enhances the competitiveness of an economy and generates a business environment conducive to firm growth and development. Good infrastructure efficiently connects firms to their customers and suppliers, and enables the use of modern production technologies. Conversely, deficiencies in infrastructure, such as loss of electricity on regular basis, create barriers to productive opportunities and increase costs for all firms, from micro enterprises to large multinational corporations.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual