Lead time to export, median case (days) - Country Ranking

Definition: Lead time to export is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from shipment point to port of loading. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case.

Source: World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Ethiopia 60.00 2018
2 Iraq 39.00 2016
3 Gabon 25.00 2018
3 Moldova 25.00 2016
5 Chad 22.00 2016
6 Congo 18.00 2018
6 Burundi 18.00 2018
8 Uzbekistan 16.00 2018
9 Venezuela 15.00 2018
10 Angola 14.00 2016
10 Benin 14.00 2018
10 Tajikistan 14.00 2014
13 Mauritania 13.00 2016
14 Sudan 11.00 2016
14 Libya 11.00 2016
16 Albania 10.00 2018
16 Qatar 10.00 2018
16 Kazakhstan 10.00 2018
19 Solomon Islands 9.00 2007
19 Zambia 9.00 2016
21 Nicaragua 8.00 2014
21 Dem. Rep. Congo 8.00 2016
23 Armenia 7.00 2018
23 Trinidad and Tobago 7.00 2016
23 Montenegro 7.00 2014
23 Liberia 7.00 2016
23 Czech Republic 7.00 2018
28 Cuba 6.00 2016
28 Sri Lanka 6.00 2018
30 Mexico 5.00 2018
30 Mali 5.00 2012
30 Burkina Faso 5.00 2018
30 Afghanistan 5.00 2012
30 Brazil 5.00 2018
30 Cameroon 5.00 2018
30 Zimbabwe 5.00 2016
37 Uruguay 4.00 2016
37 Tanzania 4.00 2018
37 Thailand 4.00 2018
37 Côte d'Ivoire 4.00 2018
37 Dominican Republic 4.00 2016
37 Honduras 4.00 2016
37 Saudi Arabia 4.00 2018
37 Tunisia 4.00 2018
37 Argentina 4.00 2018
37 Canada 4.00 2018
37 Bangladesh 4.00 2016
37 Algeria 4.00 2016
37 Pakistan 4.00 2018
37 Malawi 4.00 2018
37 Mongolia 4.00 2016
37 Kenya 4.00 2018
37 Guatemala 4.00 2018
54 Guinea 3.50 2007
55 Greece 3.00 2018
55 Eritrea 3.00 2010
55 Costa Rica 3.00 2016
55 Denmark 3.00 2018
55 Azerbaijan 3.00 2018
55 Switzerland 3.00 2018
55 Hong Kong SAR, China 3.00 2016
55 Jamaica 3.00 2016
55 Namibia 3.00 2018
55 India 3.00 2018
55 Uganda 3.00 2018
55 Ukraine 3.00 2016
55 Portugal 3.00 2018
55 Russia 3.00 2018
55 Myanmar 3.00 2018
55 Nigeria 3.00 2018
55 Paraguay 3.00 2018
55 Mozambique 3.00 2018
55 Panama 3.00 2018
55 Bolivia 3.00 2018
55 Chile 3.00 2018
55 Cambodia 3.00 2016
55 Iran 3.00 2018
55 Italy 3.00 2018
55 Turkmenistan 3.00 2010
55 Turkey 3.00 2018
55 Yemen 3.00 2016
55 South Africa 3.00 2016
83 United States 2.00 2018
83 Vietnam 2.00 2018
83 Serbia 2.00 2018
83 Jordan 2.00 2016
83 Japan 2.00 2018
83 Lao PDR 2.00 2018
83 Morocco 2.00 2018
83 Lithuania 2.00 2018
83 Luxembourg 2.00 2018
83 Austria 2.00 2018
83 Djibouti 2.00 2016
83 Indonesia 2.00 2018
83 Ireland 2.00 2016
83 Spain 2.00 2018
83 France 2.00 2018
83 Georgia 2.00 2018
83 Peru 2.00 2018
83 Papua New Guinea 2.00 2018
83 Malaysia 2.00 2018
83 Romania 2.00 2018
83 New Zealand 2.00 2012
83 Rwanda 2.00 2016
83 Singapore 2.00 2018
83 Sierra Leone 2.00 2012
83 Slovak Republic 2.00 2014
83 El Salvador 2.00 2012
83 Togo 2.00 2016
83 Oman 2.00 2018
83 Netherlands 2.00 2018
83 Croatia 2.00 2014
83 Haiti 2.00 2016
83 Korea 2.00 2016
83 Kuwait 2.00 2018
83 China 2.00 2018
83 Colombia 2.00 2018
83 Belarus 2.00 2018
83 Belgium 2.00 2018
83 United Arab Emirates 2.00 2018
83 Bulgaria 2.00 2018
83 Germany 2.00 2018
83 Estonia 2.00 2018
83 Egypt 2.00 2018
83 United Kingdom 2.00 2018
83 Finland 2.00 2018
127 The Gambia 1.00 2016
127 Ecuador 1.00 2016
127 Cyprus 1.00 2016
127 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.00 2016
127 Brunei 1.00 2018
127 Mauritius 1.00 2018
127 Malta 1.00 2018
127 Kyrgyz Republic 1.00 2014
127 Norway 1.00 2018
127 Nepal 1.00 2018
127 Philippines 1.00 2018
127 Australia 1.00 2018
127 Bahrain 1.00 2014
127 The Bahamas 1.00 2014
127 Slovenia 1.00 2018
127 Syrian Arab Republic 1.00 2016
127 Senegal 1.00 2018
127 Niger 1.00 2016
127 Poland 1.00 2018
127 Ghana 1.00 2018
127 Hungary 1.00 2014
127 Latvia 1.00 2018
127 Madagascar 1.00 2018
127 North Macedonia 1.00 2018
127 Lebanon 1.00 2016
127 Iceland 1.00 2014
127 Israel 1.00 2016
127 Sweden 1.00 2018

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: The LPI measures on-the-ground trade logistics performance, helping national leaders, key policymakers, and private sector traders understand the challenges they and their trading partners face in reducing logistical barriers to international commerce. A useful outcome measure of logistics performance is the time taken to complete trade transactions. The median import lead time for port and airport supply chains, as measured for the LPI, is more than 3.5 times longer in low performing countries than in high-performing countries. The difference is around three times for land supply chains. The association suggests that geographical hurdles, and perhaps internal transport markets, still pose substantial difficulties in many countries. Besides geography and speed en route, another factor in import lead times is the border process. Time can be reduced at all stages of this process, but especially in the clearance of goods on arrival. Countries with low logistics performance need to reform their border management so that they can reduce red tape, excessive and opaque procedural requirements, and physical inspections. Although the time to clear goods through customs is a fairly small fraction of total import time for all LPI quintiles, it rises sharply if goods are physically inspected. Core customs procedures are similar across quintiles. But low-performing countries have a far higher prevalence of physical inspection, even subjecting the same shipment to repeated inspections by multiple agencies. Many low-income countries have long export lead times, reducing their export competitiveness and ability to participate in international trade.

Limitations and Exceptions: The Logistics Performance Index is an interactive benchmarking tool created to help countries identify the challenges and opportunities they face in their performance on trade logistics and what they can do to improve their performance. Feedback from operators is supplemented with quantitative data on the performance of key components of the logistics chain in the country of work. Thus, the LPI consists of both qualitative and quantitative measures. In addition, despite being the most comprehensive data source for country logistics and trade facilitation, the LPI has two important limitations. First, the experience of international freight forwarders might not represent the broader logistics environment in poor countries, which often rely on traditional operators. And the international and traditional operators might differ in their interactions with government agencies - and in their service levels. Second, for landlocked countries and small-island states, the LPI might reflect access problems outside the country assessed, such as transit difficulties. The low rating of a landlocked country might not adequately reflect its trade facilitation efforts, which depend on the workings of complex international transit systems. Landlocked countries cannot eliminate transit inefficiencies with domestic reforms.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Data on lead time to export are from the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments) of shipments from the point of origin (the seller's factory, typically located either in the capital city or in the largest commercial center) to the port of loading or equivalent (port/airport), and excluding international shipping. The Logistics Performance Index (LPI) uses a structured online survey of logistics professionals at multinational freight forwarders and at the main express carriers. The 2012 LPI data are based on the 2011 survey, which was administered to nearly 1,000 respondents at international logistics companies in 143 countries (domestic performance indicators). The international LPI covers 155 countries. The LPI assesses both large companies and small and medium enterprises. Most of the responses are from small and medium enterprises, with large companies (those with 250 employees or more) accounting for roughly 18 percent of responses. The respondents include groups of professionals who are directly involved in day-today operations, from company headquarters and from country offices such as senior executives, area or country managers, and department managers. Many of the respondents are at corporate or regional headquarters or at country branch offices. The rest are at local branch offices or independent firms. The majority of respondents are involved in providing most logistics services as their main line of work such as warehousing and distribution, customer-tailored logistics solutions, courier services, bulk or break bulk cargo transport, and less-than-full container, full-container, or full-trailer load transport. For the lead time to export, respondents were asked for quantitative information on their countries' international supply chains by picking choices from a dropdown menu. When a response indicates a single value, the answer is coded as the logarithm of that value. When a response indicates a range, the answer is coded as the logarithm of the midpoint of that range. Country scores are produced by exponentiating the average of responses in logarithms across all respondents for a given country. This method is equivalent to taking a geometric average in levels. Scores for regions, income groups, and LPI quintiles are simple averages of the relevant country scores.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual